Version declaration proposal

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Don" <nospam at nospam.com> wrote in message 
news:gmu0lt$2agm$1 at digitalmars.com...
>I think I have a solution to the versioning problems.
> My belief is that version statements are fine, and Walter's 'rats nest' 
> argument is valid. Instead, I believe that version declarations limited to 
> "version = XXX;" are too weak. They also have syntax which is subtly 
> different to the rest of the language.
> (version = A; version = B; looks as though you're changing the value of 
> the 'version' variable).
> My proposal is therefore:
>
{snip: great proposal}

We can quibble over details of this, but I'm absolutely in full support of 
this general approach.