Old problem with performance

[Denis Koroskin]

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:24:54 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu  
<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:

> Rainer Deyke wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> C++ ctors won't do the right thing if you use pointers, which is the
>>> moral equivalent of using T[] inside MathematicalVector. If you refer  
>>> to
>>> std::vector instead, then that's a carefully-defined type that does  
>>> have
>>> the right copy constructor defined.
>>  So where's the D equivalent of std::vector?  Phobos has nothing.
>
> It will.
>
>> I was under the impression that native arrays were intended to be used
>> directly in D, something I rarely do in C++.  Certainly neither of the
>> standard libraries has any hesitation about passing unadorned dynamic
>> arrays around.
>
> Phobos2 plans to consistently consider T[] a range, not a full-fledged  
> array. A range corresponds to a pair of iterators in STL.
>
>
> Andrei

Will T[] get front, back, empty properties, and popFront(), popBack()  
methods?
Perhaps, its the time T[] internal structure is changed!
For example, ptr+size replaced by two pointers, some additional fields  
added etc..