(non)nullable types

[Jarrett Billingsley]

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Daniel Keep
<daniel.keep.lists at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is (expletive) ridiculous.
>
> Why is it that I'm unable to criticise even a tiny aspect of someone's
> proposal without people disregarding everything I've said TIME AND AGAIN
> over the past year or more that I'm in support of non-nullable
> references and go "oh but we need non-nullable references"?!

Oh...kay.  That was kind of uncalled for.  I'm sorry I don't keep tabs
on the individual opinions of everyone on this newsgroup.  It's
particularly difficult to remember things about people when all I can
see of them is their name.