OT -- Re: random cover of a range

[John Reimer]

Hello Jarrett,

> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:24 PM, John Reimer <terminal.node at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hello Christopher,
>> 
>>> John Reimer wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello bearophile,
>>>> 
>>>>> (And my name is bearophile, thank you).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bye,
>>>>> bearophile
>>>> I'm curious to know what "bearophile" means?
>>>> 
>>> No cross, no crown, no green star. If you're disgusted by someone's
>>> username and it isn't actively evil, pretend you don't know what it
>>> means. Don't write a post abusing his desired lifestyle.
>>> 
>> Hmm... very interesting.
>> 
>> And where does this "rule" of yours come from?  I'd say your forcing
>> your philosophy on me. That's not very nice. :)
>> 
> Just how many peoples' characters are you going to assassinate before
> you feel vindicated, anyway?
> 


I needn't assassinate any characters, Jarrett.  If you claim that this is 
some sort of character assassination, then you admit that what he is doing 
is wrong.   If what he is doing is not wrong, then there is nothing to even 
come close to character assination.  Your own perception is what is judging 
his character.


Certainly, from my worldview, I can believe it is very wrong.  That's why 
I say something about it.  But it appears to be the manner these days to 
defend all manner of "alternative" lifestyles... or to turn a blind eye to 
the evidencial results which shows broken lives when such things are pursued. 
  I do think it is showing care to point these things out.  You continually 
fail to see that promotion of this kind of material is not representative 
of any form of passivity.


-JJR