More LDC Exception Handling Stuff

[Don]

Christian Kamm wrote:
> dsimcha wrote:
>> When people say that exception handling doesn't work on LDC in some
>> circumstances, does this mean that if the code uses exceptions it won't
>> work, that you can't catch exceptions or something else?
> 
> That really depends. It could mean that exception handling is buggy (LLVM
> bug in x86-64) or that something is fundamentally amiss (Windows) and
> unwinding the stack to the correct catch clause does not work. In the
> latter case, we make 'throw' print out a message and terminate the program
> instead.
> 
>> Would I be able to use LDC on 
>> platforms where exception handling isn't supported, with library code that
>> throws exceptions, as long as I didn't care about catching these
>> exceptions?
> 
> I'd expect so, though it hasn't been tried.
> 
Does that mean that it compiles, at least?