Why isn't ++x an lvalue in D?

Weed resume755 at mail.ru
Thu Jan 8 22:53:02 PST 2009


Nick Sabalausky пишет:
> "Weed" <resume755 at mail.ru> wrote in message 
> news:gk6n29$218m$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> Bill Baxter ?????:
>>> 2009/1/9 Weed <resume755 at mail.ru>:
>>>> Bill Baxter ?????:
>>>>> Another thread just reminded me of something I use frequently in C++
>>>>> that doesn't work in D because ++x is not an lvalue:
>>>>>
>>>>>    int x,N;
>>>>>   ...
>>>>>    ++x %= N;
>>>>>
>>>>> So is there some deep reason for not making it an lvalue like in C++?
>>>>>
>>>> ++x is x+=1 in D:
>>>>
>>>> void main() {
>>>>  int i =3;
>>>>  int N =2;
>>>>  (i+=1) %= N;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Error: i += 1 is not an lvalue.
>>>>
>>>> C++:
>>>>
>>>> int main()
>>>> {
>>>>  int i = 2;
>>>>  int N = 3;
>>>>  i+1 %= N;
>>>>
>>>>  return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment
>>>>
>>> What does C++ do if you use  (i+=1) %= N instead of (i+1)?  Doesn't +=
>>> also return an lvalue in C++?
>> I am a bit mixed, but the meaning has not changed:
>>
>> $ cat demo.cpp
>> int main()
>> {
>> int i = 2;
>> int N = 3;
>> i+=1 %= N;
>>
> 
> Shouldn't that be "(i += 1) %= N"? Assignments are right-associative (but 
> then these are op-assigns...). The error is probably saying that "1" can't 
> be an lvalue for "%= N" which, of course, is true.

Yes, my code is wrongю

And apparently, we have an error in D

> 
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> $ c++ demo.cpp
>> demo.cpp: In function 'int main()':
>> demo.cpp:5: error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment
> 
> 
> 



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list