Any chance to call Tango as Extended Standard Library

[Walter Bright]

dsimcha wrote:
> One point of clarification:  opApply isn't going to be deprecated anytime soon, is
> it?  It seems like ranges still have a bunch of rough edges, and although I like
> the idea in principle, I'm only willing to convert to ranges if I can define
> iterable objects with the same level of syntactic sugar as opApply gives me.  For
> simple cases this is already true and I have begun converting some stuff.
> However, for more complicated cases, opApply is still a lot more flexible.

opApply isn't going away. For one thing, it works very well with 
recursive data structures.