Protection in BaseClassList: semantics undefined?

[Frank Benoit]

Jarrett Billingsley schrieb:
> As far as most people can tell, it's an artifact from very early on in
> D's development.  It was probably originally supposed to have MI but
> that was dropped.  The compiler accepts public/private/protected on
> the base class but it's useless as it breaks things.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=177