Number literals (Was: Re: Case Range Statement ..)

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Derek Parnell wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:08:55 -0400, bearophile wrote:
> 
>> Nick Sabalausky:
>>> why in the world is anyone defending the continued existance of "5." and ".5"?<
>> I'm for disallowing them; 5.0 ad 0.5 are better.
>> Anyone else pro/against this idea?
> 
> I would not complain if trailing dot and leading dot were disallowed.

I think the question that should be asked is: would anyone complain if
they were kept? We have bigger rocks to move than that one.

Andrei