Number literals (Was: Re: Case Range Statement ..)

[Walter Bright]

BCS wrote:
>> I don't see where the "gotcha" is. It's not trivial, but it's
>> specifiable, and the code implementing it is there and is correct.
>>
> 
> well for one thing the spec is wrong:  
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1466

That issue has nothing to do with octal literals, and removing them will 
have no affect on it.