Developing a plan for D2.0:

[Jason House]

Sadly, this has been the writing on the wall for some time. For me, the critical question for D2 is "How will unique be handled?". Andrei favors a library-based struct-only solution (Where structs with non-immutable pointers/references are disallowed)

I'm surprised to hear that Bartosz's ownership scheme wouldbe adopted at all. I hope it does, I like it.

Nick B Wrote:
 
> Bartosz wrote the following on his blog:
> 
> Bartosz Milewski Says:
> 
> July 20, 2009 at 2:59 pm
> 
> To Álvaro: We’ve just had a conference–Andrei, Walter and I. We decided 
> that we have a deadline for D2, so we have to cut some features and 
> postpone them to D3. The race-free type system won’t make it–there just 
> isn’t enough time to implement and test it. There will be however a 
> stopgap solution for message passing in Phobos. It will be limited but safe.
> 
> Source: 
> http://bartoszmilewski.wordpress.com/2009/07/16/on-actors-and-casting/#comments
> See comment 15.
> 
> Perhaps Walter, would like to publish or confirm what is on the final 
> list for D2. It would reduce confusion and rumour.
> 
> cheers
> Nick B.