[~OT] Finally, a clear, concise D spec!

[Jarrett Billingsley]

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Daniel
Keep<daniel.keep.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, but you can't seriously claim D is still easy to implement whilst
> .stringof still exists in its current form.  :P

Oh, .stringof is nothing compared to the complexity added by string mixins ;)

Or some of the scarier parsing issues.  (Type).Identifier and the (int
x) { return x + 5; } delegates are two things that come to mind..