new DIP5: Properties 2

[Kagamin]

Daniel Keep Wrote:

> Let's all create our own DIPs as slight variations of existing ones when
> we disagree instead of actually working together!

People draw their proposals, they are criticised and new proposals are drawn. This is how discussion works.

> Is there ANY reason this couldn't have been put into DIP4 as an
> alternative solution?

I didn't thought it's meant to work this way.

> This isn't even an objective proposal...
> 
> "Parts of DIP4 are too puristic and as a consequence - insane."  No
> objective reasoning given; just calling DIP4 "insane."

Yeah, it may lack political correctness.