new DIP5: Properties 2

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

grauzone wrote:
>> This is *exactly* why I said DIPs need to have some form of editorial
>> control.
> 
> I agree. DIPs shouldn't just be "newsgroup postings with higher 
> exposure". At least we'd need a higher entry barrier, like some checking 
> for formal requirements. Yay for bureaucracy.

I agree. That bureaucracy should be community-enforced; Walter and I 
lack the resources to add to organizing DIPs, though we'd be glad to try 
them.


Andrei