[~OT] Finally, a clear, concise D spec!

[Jarrett Billingsley]

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:03 AM, language_fan<foo at bar.com.invalid> wrote:
> Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:55:40 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley thusly wrote:
>
>> so its various
>> introspection capabilities are kind of .. organically grown.
>> ...
>> __traits is ugly only because W wanted it to be.
>
> Good points.. that could also be the case. Now that the D 2.0
> specification has not been frozen yet, supposedly these kinds of issues
> could be solved before it is too late?

In theory, yes.  In reality, probably not.