new DIP5: Properties 2

[Rainer Deyke]

Benji Smith wrote:
> So the clusterfuck of unenforceable and useless conventions is already
> here. Here's my suggestions: if you think putting parentheses on a
> no-arg function is stupid, then it should be a syntax error for them to
> exist. That wouldn't be my first choice, but it'd be a thousand times
> better than the situation with optional parens.

+1


-- 
Rainer Deyke - rainerd at eldwood.com