The proper case for D.

["Jérôme M. Berger"]

Steve Teale wrote:
>>>> What's up with all the negativity lately? Impatience?
>>> Some people think D2 tries too much, and neglects the really important
>>> things at the same time. For example, D2 tries to solve the concurrency
>>> issue (which is a hot topic which makes D look good at sites like
>>> stackoverflow), while still relying on a 20 years old linker written in
>>> assembler.
>> So the better direction according to some is to stagnate language design for 
>> D2 so Walter Bright can reinvent the linker? So that years later when asked 
>> why D didn't do more for concurrency when it was needed, you'd have to 
>> reply: "well there wasn't any time to deal with such trivial issues, the 
>> language designer had to work on the toolchain."
>>
> You are of course completely correct in this, but the question is,
> can you do a new linker? I can't. There must be someone out there who can - please, please.
> 
> 
http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/ ?

		Jerome
-- 
mailto:jeberger at free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeberger at jabber.fr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20090621/5bc501a3/attachment.pgp>