declaration/expression

[Jarrett Billingsley]

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Ellery
Newcomer<ellery-newcomer at utulsa.edu> wrote:

> Wrong. Both are perfectly valid declarations (and did you miss my note?
> the compiler *IS* interpreting the second as a declaration).
> Okay, consider the rule declarator, which is (or should, if the grammar
> wants to correctly reflect what the compiler is doing) defined like so
>
> Declarator:
>      BasicType2opt Identifier DeclaratorSuffixesopt
>      BasicType2opt ( Declarator ) DeclaratorSuffixesopt

Ah, fuck.  I can't believe D still accepts those.  All the ambiguity
probably goes away without them, huh.