Null references (oh no, not again!)

Walter Bright newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Tue Mar 3 21:55:19 PST 2009


Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> Exactly.  I thought one of the ideas behind D was to have "safe"
> defaults.  Yeah, I know, null references can't actually do damage to
> your computer because of virtual memory, but neither can concurrent
> access to shared data, or accessing uninitialized variables, but
> they're taken care of.

Those last two *are* unsafe, memory corrupting problems.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list