Null references (oh no, not again!)

[Alex Burton]

Alex Burton Wrote:


> 
> Oops I'm wrong the 2/3 is NON nullable. My brain seems to have trouble reading all this 'non null' stuff.
> 
Actually non nullable is a double negative.

What we really want in the D language and the language of the discussions about D is simple.

1) Types.

2) Nullable Types - optional

There is no need for Non Nullable types. These are Types.

Alex