in vs. const

[Denis Koroskin]

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:07:05 +0300, Kagamin <spam at here.lot> wrote:

> Sergey Gromov Wrote:
>
>> In D2, 'in' means 'const scope'.  I've seen that in writing but can't
>> remember where.
>
> How can it be scope? If you have scope object, it gets *destructed* when  
> leaving scope: when function exits. Ouch.

No. Scope has different meaning here. For example, delegates don't cause heap allocation when passed as scope parameters in D2.