catchy phrase for this idiom?

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:37:06 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley  
<jarrett.billingsley at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
> <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> How do you do this without the Template Identity syntax?
>> (I'm going to start calling it this to promote the term I thought was  
>> best
>> ;)
>
> I'm not suggesting it be removed.  I'm suggesting that if you were
> only able to put one symbol in the template, it would be completely
> unnecessary.  Templates would always resolve to the single symbol that
> they declare.

So without requiring the alias how do you rewrite my example?  I'm not  
saying you are wrong, I just don't grasp what you are saying.  An example  
would be helpful.

-Steve