Bug? package attribute half working on child packages.
Jarrett Billingsley
jarrett.billingsley at gmail.com
Sun Mar 15 17:32:31 PDT 2009
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Daniel Keep
<daniel.keep.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Jeremie Pelletier <jeremiep at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I don't know if it's really a bug, but the package protection attribute seems to have a different semantic in the current packages than in nested packages.
>>>
>>> For example, say you have the module test which declares the following:
>>> ---
>>> module test.Foo;
>>>
>>> package uint myVar;
>>> package class MyClass {}
>>>
>>> package void MyFunc();
>>>
>>> class Foo {
>>> package void MyFoo();
>>> }
>>> ---
>>>
>>> All declarations are accessible from any module in the test package, but if you try and access them from a child package, say test.somepackage.Foo, then only myVar and MyClass are accessible, both MyFunc and Foo.MyFoo says they aren't accessible from test.somepackage.Foo.
>>>
>>> I'm using the latest DMD version 2.
>>>
>>
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2529
>>
>> Feel free to comment or vote.
>
> A quick poke in the source code reveals a hasPackageAccess function in
> access.c. Haven't tried this, but maybe the attached patch (made
> against the 1.041 release) will get the desired behaviour; I just
> quickly changed it to search not just the scope's package, but also its
> ancestors.
>
> -- Daniel
>
>
>
> --- access.c 2009-03-05 01:56:46.000000000 +1100
> +++ access.c 2009-03-16 10:47:56.187500000 +1100
> @@ -305,12 +305,21 @@
> printf("\tthis is in package '%s'\n", s->toChars());
> #endif
>
> - if (s && s == sc->module->parent)
> + if (s)
> {
> -#if LOG
> - printf("\ts is in same package as sc\n");
> -#endif
> - return 1;
> + Dsymbol scp = sc->module->parent;
> + for (Dsymbol scp = sc->module->parent;
> + scp && scp->isPackage() && !scp->isModule();
> + scp = scp->parent)
> + {
> + if (s && s == scp)
> + {
> +#if LOG
> + printf("\ts is in same package as or ancestor package of sc\n");
> +#endif
> + return 1;
> + }
> + }
> }
Oh! I suppose we can now.. give this a shot, and recompile the thing! :D
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list