new D2.0 + C++ language

[naryl]

Weed Wrote:
> naryl �����:
> > Weed Wrote:
> >> BCS ���������������:
> >>> Yes you can be
> >>> very careful in keeping track of pointers (not practical) or use smart
> >>> pointers and such (might end up costing more than GC)
> >> I am do not agree: GC overexpenditure CPU or memory. Typically, both.
> > 
> > I wouldn't be so sure about CPU:
> > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/debian/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=gdc&lang2=gpp&box=1
> 
> You should not compare benchmarks - they depend on the quality of the
> testing code.
 
Then find a way to prove that GC costs more CPU time than explicit memory management and/or reference counting.