new D2.0 + C++ language

[Simen Kjaeraas]

Weed <resume755 at mail.ru> wrote:

> Simen Kjaeraas пишет:
>> Weed <resume755 at mail.ru> wrote:
>>
>>>> I think the point you're trying to make is that a GC is more memory
>>>> intensive.
>>>
>>> + Sometimes allocation and freeing of memory in an arbitrary
>>> unpredictable time  unacceptable. (in game development or realtime
>>> software, for example. One hundred million times discussed about it
>>> there, I guess)
>>
>> Then use the stub GC or disable the GC, then re-enable it when
>> you have the time to run a sweep (yes, you can).
>>
> 	
> Then a memory overrun

If so, you have allocated a lot of things you shouldn't have, or otherwise
would have the same problem using manual allocation.

>>> A need language that does not contain a GC (or contains optional). Many
>>> C++ programmers do not affect the D only because of this.
>>
>> While GC in D is not optional, it can be stubbed out or disabled,
>
> Then some part of the language will stop working (dynamic arrays, and
> possibly delegates)

Yes. So don't use those parts, or disable the GC and enable it
when you have the time.