new D2.0 + C++ language

[BCS]

Reply to Weed,

> Simen Kjaeraas ?????:
> 
>> Weed <resume755 at mail.ru> wrote:
>> 
>>>> I think the point you're trying to make is that a GC is more memory
>>>> intensive.
>>>> 
>>> + Sometimes allocation and freeing of memory in an arbitrary
>>> unpredictable time  unacceptable. (in game development or realtime
>>> software, for example. One hundred million times discussed about it
>>> there, I guess)
>>> 
>> Then use the stub GC or disable the GC, then re-enable it when you
>> have the time to run a sweep (yes, you can).
>> 
> Then a memory overrun
> 

I can't think of a case where having the GC running would be a problem where 
allocating memory at all would not (malloc/new/most any allocator is NOT 
cheap)