State of Play

Daniel Keep daniel.keep.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 26 06:10:10 PDT 2009



ValeriM wrote:
> Ary Borenszweig Wrote:
> 
>> Mike James escribi�:
>>> What is the state of play with D1.0 vs. D2.0?
>>>
>>> Is D1.0 a dead-end and D2.0 should be used for future projects?
>>>
>>> Is D2.0 stable enough for use at the present?
>>>
>>> Is Tango for D2.0 at a level of D1.0 and can be used now?
>>>
>>> Is DWT ready for D2.0 now?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards, mike.
>> I don't know why a lot of people see D1.0 as a dead-end. It's a stable 
>> language. It won't get new features. It won't change. It'll probably 
>> receive bug fixes. It works. It gets the job done. You can use it and be 
>> sure than in a time all of what you did will still be compatible with 
>> "newer" versions of D1.
> 
> No. It's not stable.
> Try to build last Tango and DWT releases with D1.041 and you will get the problems.

"It's a stable language."

Note the use of the word "language."

What you're referring to are bugs in the compiler.  It happens.

  -- Daniel



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list