State of Play

Tomas Lindquist Olsen tomas.l.olsen at gmail.com
Thu Mar 26 14:37:57 PDT 2009


On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:45 PM, grauzone <none at example.net> wrote:
> Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
>>
>> Which leads me to: If I was to help with a D 1.1 implementation, only
>> features that would not change any semantics of valid D1 code would go
>> in.
>
> Isn't this the point of the whole "D 1.1" idea?
>

People seem to have different ideas of what D 1.1 should be.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list