Declaring Ref Variables Inside Function Calls

[Leandro Lucarella]

Andrei Alexandrescu, el 31 de marzo a las 18:42 me escribiste:
> Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> >Andrei Alexandrescu, el 31 de marzo a las 17:55 me escribiste:
> >>>But in Python or ML, no question. I'd happily write a function that
> >>>returns (2, 4.2) without giving it much thought.  Now perhaps cogent
> >>>arguments like "blech" and "belch" can convince me that I should
> >>>embrace the Tuple!(int,float) and use it everywhere, just like I'd use
> >>>tuples in Python and ML, but so far I'm not convinced.
> >>>To me it seems to be in the same league as int[] vs std::vector<int>.
> >>>int[] -- great I'll happily use that everywhere.  std::vector<int>
> >>>kind of a pain, use begrudgingly as needed.
> >>Well I think a language can only have so many built-in types. We can't
> >>go on forever.
> >You don't have to. There are very few types that are extremely useful to
> >build up things having a good syntax. I think Python got this right:
> >tuples, lists, hashes. That's all you need as first class citizens
> >(speaking of "containers"). I think D is only missing tuples (dynamic
                                                                 ^^^^^^^
> >arrays works just fine as lists in D).
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> So we must add lists too.

Are you ignoring what I'm writing on purpose? =)

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
He used to do surgery
On girls in the eighties
But gravity always wins