Declaring Ref Variables Inside Function Calls

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Bill Baxter wrote:
> Ok, then we'll introduce balanced budget amendment for types to ensure
> this doesn't happen.  For every new type added one must be removed.
> We're going to vote complex types off the island, right?   Maybe we
> could get rid of associative arrays as a built-in too.

Ironic as that might be, I wouldn't mind it. The syntax of associative 
array types is nice, but other than that they are terribly opaque to 
introspection. If I could, I'd say T[U] rewrites into Hash!(U, T) and 
then Hash is defined in object.d.


Andrei