RFC: naming for FrontTransversal and Transversal ranges

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Benji Smith wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Also something that wasn't discussed that much is the connection of 
>> whatever design we devise, with the GC. I am mightily excited by the 
>> possibility to operate without GC or with tight reference counting, 
>> and I thought many around here would share that excitement. If we go 
>> for non-gc ways of memory management, that will probably affect 
>> container design.
> 
> Just out of curiosity, why do you like reference counting more than 
> mark/sweep for containers?

Who told you I like it? All I do is acknowledge that RC and MS have 
different tradeoffs that may form the basis of a preference.

Andrei