It is a bug ?

[grauzone]

Denis Koroskin wrote:
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 19:33:03 +0400, Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Du Liang <duliang.21 at 163.com> wrote:
>>
>>>        int[] arrB = [2,2,2]; // arrB is static in[]  or bug ?
>> Declaring the variable like this uses a single array for all instances
>> of AB.  You should initialize it in this() instead, or put "arrB =
>> arrB.dup;" in this().
> 
> I believe this is a horrible inconsistency. It shouldn't be allowed in first place, because typeof([2,2,2]) is immutable(int)[] in this context.

DWIM would be to let the compiler automatically move these instructions 
into all ctors.

class A {
    int[] arrB = [2,2,2];
    X x = new X();
    this() {
        code1();
    }
    this(int) {
        code2();
    }
}

would be transformed into

class A {
    int[] arrB;
    X x;
    this() {
        arrB = [2,2,2];
        x = new X();
        code1();
    }
    this(int) {
        arrB = [2,2,2];
        x = new X();
        code2();
    }
}