What's the current state of D?

[Don]

BCS wrote:
> Reply to F,
> 
>> Finally, new releases are provided as optional, not as compulsory. If
>> someone wants to stick with one compiler version, he/she could do the
>> job with that version and that's all.
>>
> 
> The one issue with that re 2.0 is that you can be faced with choosing 
> between working thought a breaking change or not getting bug fixes ever 
> again.
> 
> 
Yes, but there's no way it would make sense to standardize on a 
particular release of D2 -- it's still in way too much of an alpha 
state. In another six months, I think it would make sense.