"with" should be deprecated with extreme prejudice

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

BCS wrote:
> Hello Andrei,
> 
>> dsimcha wrote:
>>
>>> Absolutely not.  It's far too useful as syntactic sugar when working
>>> heavily with plain old data structs, and saves a lot of tedious
>>> repetition of the struct instance name.
>>>
>> Make it a member function! If you don't have access to the struct, use
>> "s." as the prefix! I can't believe that's stopping you from getting
>> work done!
>>
> 
> I don't follow.
> 
> 

"s." is hardly any typing.

Andrei