"with" still sucks + removing features + adding features

[Derek Parnell]

On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:53:51 -0400, bearophile wrote:

> Bill Baxter:
>> Thinking about it more, I guess you must actually be seeing it as a
>> rule of   " '..' always does the most useful thing",
> 
> Such attitude/purposes have created the monkey mess named Perl :-]

I submit the D words 'static', 'auto' and 'scope' as examples of this too.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell