"with" still sucks + removing features + adding features
derek at psych.ward
Mon May 18 20:58:09 PDT 2009
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:15:17 -0400, Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
> Derek Parnell Wrote:
>> case [FIRST ; LAST] :
> Personally I feel that your syntax breaks the condition
> (6) Must not be keystroke-heavy
Huh?? By keystroke-heavy I meant the number of keyboard presses the finger
would have to do to write it.
Ignoring FIRST/LAST, I have 3 (three) keystrokes and Andrei has 8
Me = [ ; ]
Andrei = SHIFT : .. case
> I like Andei's syntax best but as previously stated, its ambiguous with exclusive ranges.
> Maybe the solution is a second range operator that is inclusive, such as:
> case FIRST ... LAST:
Which is 3 keystrokes too.
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by saying my suggestion breaks (6).
More information about the Digitalmars-d