"with" still sucks + removing features + adding features
wbaxter at gmail.com
Mon May 18 21:09:50 PDT 2009
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Rainer Deyke <rainerd at eldwood.com> wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Even Perl would turn its nose at a significant semantic difference
>> brought by the third period.
> Not true: Perl has a '..' operator and a '...' operator with distinct
> but similar meanings. And as much as I loathe Perl in general, I don't
> see anything wrong with that. I am open to a reasonable alternate syntax.
Heh, right you are.
If Ruby won't turn it's nose up at a two dot / three dot distinction,
then it would be hard to believe Perl would.
But leave it to Perl to give it a completely obscure meaning.
More information about the Digitalmars-d