"with" still sucks + removing features + adding features

[Ary Borenszweig]

Robert Fraser escribió:
> Ary Borenszweig wrote:
>>> Oh, and this speaks more about the .b syntax than anything else. Does 
>>> anyone actually use this...? If it was removed, b could still be 
>>> accessed by its fully-qualified name, so its' removal not a huge loss.
>>
>> "But that will make porting C code harder"
>>
>> Guess who'll say that. ;-)
> 
> ??? C allows .x to access a global member? You learn something useless 
> every day...

Aaaaaaaaaaah... I thought they were talking about .1, .2, etc.

I forgot about .foo