ideas about ranges
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Fri May 22 13:40:55 PDT 2009
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> ref accomplishes all of this, except you can't get at the underlying
> pointer to do things like compare to null or rebind. Maybe we simply
> need some new operators to get at the ref addresses.
Defining null references has been on the table too. I wrote a paragraph
about them and then deleted it in fear of major aggravation.
There's no need for new syntax. We can easily define things such that
you can return *null when a reference is expected and checking
&(r.popNext()) is null to figure out what's happening. I think it's bad
More information about the Digitalmars-d