ideas about ranges

Lionello Lunesu lionello at
Fri May 22 20:18:05 PDT 2009

"Andrei Alexandrescu" <SeeWebsiteForEmail at> wrote in message 
news:gv7j9t$m9g$2 at
> Lionello Lunesu wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Given the bad reputation that pointers have, I guess people wouldn't 
>>> like this all that much.
>> You don't need a pointer to T, you need a nullable T :)
>> ...which doesn't exist...
> You need a nullable reference to T...

Agreed. I just wanted to make a point (again) about nullable types. A 
nullable reference would be great, as long as it works for all types, 
builtins/classes/structs/... Without nullable references, SafeD will be a 


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list