Can you find out where the code goes wrong?

[Don]

Robert Fraser wrote:
> grauzone wrote:
>> That is, if SafeD
>> is really meant to be more than a vaporware-joke.
> 
> It's currently implemented in D2 using the -safe switch, AFAIK

Currently it prevents you from using inline asm, but it doesn't stop you 
  from using pointers. So it's still 80% vapourware.