Semantics of toString

[Lutger]

Don wrote:
...
> 
> There is a definite use for such as thing. But the existing toString()
> is much, much worse than useless. People think you can do something with
> it, but you can't.
> eg, people have asked for BigInt to support toString(). That is an
> over-my-dead-body.

Since you are in the know and probably the biggest toString() hater around: 
are there plans (or rejections thereof) to change toString() before D2 turns 
gold? Seems to me it could break quite some code.