Array literals REALLY should be immutable

[Max Samukha]

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:28:05 +0100, Don <nospam at nospam.com> wrote:

>I think this is quite horrible. [1, 2, 3] looks like an array literal, 
>but it isn't -- it's an array constructor. It doesn't look like a 
>function call. It shouldn't be.
>

I absolutely agree.

One note: I hope that x3 will remain valid and be indexable with a
compile-time value.