How about Go's... error on unused imports?

[Walter Bright]

Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Walter Bright, el 14 de noviembre a las 10:36 me escribiste:
>> Leandro Lucarella wrote:
>>> Does this makes more sense?
>> Yes.
> 
> It would be pushing to much to ask if you're willing to give it a serious
> thought then? =)

I understand it (I think), but I'm not as keen on it as you are <g>.

Consider that D has function hijacking protection (I think this is 
unique to D) so that inadvertent overloading by the same names in 
different imports is virtually eliminated. So I think the marginal 
benefit of the proposed changes is small.