Should the comma operator be removed in D2?

[Leandro Lucarella]

Ellery Newcomer, el 17 de noviembre a las 17:01 me escribiste:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:51 PM, KennyTM~ <kennytm at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Nov 18, 09 05:40, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> >>> Bill Baxter wrote:
> >>>> However, I think for the good of humanity we can accept that one
> >>>> little bizarre example of legal C syntax not doing the same thing in
> >>>> D.
> >>> int[] i;
> >>>
> >>> auto a = (i)[0];
> >>>
> >>> what does this do?
> >> (i) should not construct a tuple. Probably (i,).
> > 
> > That's Python's solution and it seems to work out ok.
> > 
> > --bb
> 
> How do we express tuple types? Since we have tuple expression syntactic
> support, we should have tuple type syntactic support. Cuz I'm going to
> want stuff like
> 
> Tuple!(int,int) [] lst;

I can live with that, you won't be writing types that often, but I could
certainly appreciate a better syntax if we can find one.

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca)                     http://llucax.com.ar/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Y Gloria Carrá, Gloria Estephan, Gloria Gaynor y Gloria Trevi.
	-- Peperino Pómoro