static foreach is deferred

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Jesse Phillips wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:15:34 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> 
>> Walter and I agreed that static foreach, although present in TDPL, poses
>> enough new problems to warrant its deferral to post-D2.
>>
>> Andrei
> 
> Just a clarification request. static foreach will be part of the D2 spec 
> but not implemented prior to release? I ask because post-D2 sounds like 
> D3, but present in TDPL sounds like part of the spec for D2.

It will go away from TDPL, as much as it pains me (I had a killer 
example using it).

Andrei