Short list with things to finish for D2

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
> 
>> I am thinking that representing operators by their exact token
>> representation is a principled approach because it allows for unambiguous
>> mapping,
> 
> There used to be an argument floating around that using 'opAdd" was
> better than "op+" because the former encourages people to only
> overload the method to do things that resemble addition.  Whereas op+
> says I'm just a symbol, do whatever you want with me.
> 
> I never really bought into it... but it was what I was told years ago
> when I complained that opSub opMul etc were harder to remember than
> need be. :-)
> I guess D will have to change it's story now.
> 
> --bb

FWIW, I'm not buying into that either. May be one of those cases in 
which community's experience and insight has slowly obviated the party line.

Andrei