Short list with things to finish for D2

[Don]

Simen kjaeraas wrote:
> Don <nospam at nospam.com> wrote:
> 
>> aarti_pl wrote:
>>> bearophile pisze:
>>>> aarti_pl:
>>>>
>>>>> I think that proposed names exactly reflect the meaning. So I would 
>>>>> say it is perfectly consistent with D convention.
>>>>
>>>> Dollars are money, but opDollar is not a member function that 
>>>> returns the price of a struct. So I don't agree with you, or I don't 
>>>> understand what you mean.
>>>>
>>>> Bye,
>>>> bearophile
>>>  I agree. opDollar is not particularly fitting to D language operator 
>>> concept. opLength/opSize would fit better.
>>
>> Unfortunately $ is not necessarily the length, nor the size. It might 
>> not even be an arithmetic type.
> 
> opEnd, then?
> 

That was the only other viable suggestion. But I don't think it's very 
intuitive -- eg, it sounds like there ought to be an opBegin(); why 
isn't it used for ranges?; etc.
I'd go for opLength() if it really was a length, but it's not.

The big thing in favour of opDollar() is that everyone instantly knows 
exactly what it means.