removal of cruft from D

[Leandro Lucarella]

Bill Baxter, el 20 de noviembre a las 14:10 me escribiste:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Adam D. Ruppe
> <destructionator at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 04:49:52PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >> 2. Octal literals! I think it'd be great to have a new octal syntax, or even
> >> better, a general any-positive-inter-base syntax.
> >
> > Both D and DMC accept 0b0000 as a binary literal. If 0x is hex, it seems
> > logical that octal should be 0o10.
> >
> > It looks silly, but it fits the pattern, provides the literal for those
> > who use it, and isn't valid right now.
> 
> Exactly what I was thinking. 0o08.
> Except I don't think it looks so silly.
> And even if it does look silly, who cares.  Octal literals *are* silly.  :-)

And it is consistent with Python 3.0, if anybody cares ;)

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca)                     http://llucax.com.ar/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
La máquina de la moneda, mirá como te queda!
	-- Sidharta Kiwi