Conspiracy Theory #1
retard
re at tard.com.invalid
Sat Nov 21 07:11:19 PST 2009
Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:46 -0700, Travis Boucher wrote:
> The future of D to me is very uncertain. I see some very bright
> possibilities in the embedded area and the web cluster area (these are
> my 2 areas, so I can't speak on the scientific applications). However
> the limited targets for the official DMD, and the adoption lag in gdc
> (and possibly ldc) are issues that need to be addressed before I can see
> the language getting some of the real attention that it deserves.
Agreed, basically you would need to go the gdc/gcc route since e.g. arm/
mips backends on llvm aren't as mature and clearly digitalmars only
targets x86.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list