Conspiracy Theory #1

retard re at tard.com.invalid
Sat Nov 21 07:11:19 PST 2009


Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:46 -0700, Travis Boucher wrote:

> The future of D to me is very uncertain.  I see some very bright
> possibilities in the embedded area and the web cluster area (these are
> my 2 areas, so I can't speak on the scientific applications).  However
> the limited targets for the official DMD, and the adoption lag in gdc
> (and possibly ldc) are issues that need to be addressed before I can see
> the language getting some of the real attention that it deserves.

Agreed, basically you would need to go the gdc/gcc route since e.g. arm/
mips backends on llvm aren't as mature and clearly digitalmars only 
targets x86.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list